Jim Jordan, Russ Hellickson, Ohio State wrestling, and the Strauss scandal / 1980s–2020s
The Ohio State scandal became a second controversy when former wrestlers accused head coach Russ Hellickson and assistant coach Jim Jordan—who later became a prominent U.S. representative—of knowing that Strauss was abusing athletes and failing to stop him. Strauss's locker was reportedly next to Jordan's, and former wrestlers argued that the physician's conduct was an open secret in the wrestling program. A retired referee later alleged that he warned Jordan and Hellickson about Strauss's behavior and that the warning was dismissed. Former wrestlers also described Larkins Hall as a deeply compromised environment, where adult voyeurs allegedly watched athletes in locker rooms, showers, and saunas; witnesses said Hellickson sometimes removed voyeurs from the building and urged the university to provide athletes with a private facility. Jordan denied that any student-athlete ever reported abuse to him, while Hellickson and other former staff members disputed or rejected the accusations.
The dispute intensified when wrestlers alleged that Hellickson and members of the Jordan family attempted to pressure witnesses after the allegations became public. Former UFC fighter Mark Coleman and others said they were contacted and urged to recant or soften statements that Jordan had known about Strauss. Mike DiSabato later alleged intimidation and retaliation in a Title IX lawsuit, while his brother Adam testified in 2020 that Jordan had called him crying and begging him to turn against Mike. Jordan rejected the claims as false, and no wrestler accused him of personally committing sexual abuse. The Perkins Coie investigation examined the allegations, but the controversy remained centered on whether coaches and administrators ignored warning signs that could have stopped Strauss years earlier. Former wrestlers continued opposing Jordan publicly, including during his 2023 bid to become Speaker of the House.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.