1966 Notre Dame vs. Michigan State game; Ara Parseghian / 1960s
On November 19, 1966, undefeated No. 1 Notre Dame and undefeated No. 2 Michigan State played before roughly 80,000 spectators in East Lansing in a matchup promoted as college football’s “Game of the Century.” The Spartans led 10–7 at halftime, but Notre Dame tied the contest with Joe Azzaro’s 28-yard field goal early in the fourth quarter. With 1:24 remaining, Notre Dame had the ball at its own 30-yard line and a remote chance to move into range for a winning kick. Instead of attacking, coach Ara Parseghian ordered a series of conservative running plays, including a fourth-down conversion from Notre Dame’s 39. Michigan State burned all three timeouts, but Notre Dame refused to risk a turnover. On the final play, backup quarterback Coley O’Brien was stopped after a short quarterback sneak, ending the nationally anticipated clash in a 10–10 tie.
The decision immediately became a matter of national argument. Sports Illustrated writer Dan Jenkins mocked Parseghian’s approach with the phrase “Tie one for the Gipper,” suggesting that Notre Dame had played for poll position rather than victory. Critics believed the Irish should have made a serious attempt to win—or accepted the risk of losing—especially with unbeaten, two-time defending champion Alabama also competing for the national title. Parseghian defended himself for decades, pointing to injuries to quarterback Terry Hanratty, center George Goeddeke, and other key players, Notre Dame’s inability to complete its recent passes, and the danger of handing Michigan State a late winning opportunity. The strategy ultimately worked in the polls: Notre Dame finished No. 1, Michigan State No. 2, and both schools shared the National Football Foundation’s MacArthur Bowl, while Alabama was ranked behind them despite an 11–0 record. Michigan State’s frustration was compounded by Big Ten bowl rules that prevented it from playing in the Rose Bowl or any other bowl, leaving the undefeated Spartans without a postseason game.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.