In 2018, Al Jazeera’s investigative documentary Cricket’s Match-Fixers alleged that bookmakers and intermediaries were not merely manipulating individual players but altering the cricket pitch itself. The central figure was Tharanga Indika, the groundsman and assistant manager at Sri Lanka’s Galle International Stadium, who was filmed describing how a surface could be prepared to favor either batsmen or bowlers. The documentary linked Indika to Mumbai-based professional cricketer Robin Morris and Sri Lankan first-class player Tharindu Mendis, alleging that they planned to influence results by controlling pitch conditions and then betting on the expected outcome. The alleged scheme included Sri Lanka’s 2016 Test against Australia and its 2017 Test against India in Galle, as well as a proposed operation surrounding England’s 2018 tour.
The most striking examples were the sharply contrasting results. Against Australia in 2016, Sri Lanka won by 229 runs after Australia lost all 20 wickets in three days; the documentary claimed the pitch had deliberately been prepared as a treacherous, bowler-friendly surface and that bookmakers profited by betting against a draw. Against India in 2017, the Galle pitch allegedly had been made highly favorable to batting, allowing India to build a first-innings total above 600 and win by 304 runs. Australia’s Steve Smith, David Warner, and Nathan Lyon reportedly complained about the Galle surface after their defeat. The ICC criticized Al Jazeera for not supplying its evidence before broadcast and requested the underlying material, while Al Jazeera refused, citing journalist safety. Indika was reported as having admitted to doctoring pitches, but the broader allegations involving Morris, Mendis, and other matches remained subject to investigation and denial. Sri Lanka Cricket later replaced the Galle pitch identified in the documentary, and the scandal damaged confidence in the integrity of Test results and contributed to the postponement of the inaugural Lanka Premier League.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.